Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stuart Parker vs Sho Shimabukuro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parker vs Shimabukuro analysis and find out who is favored!
Stuart Parker vs Sho Shimabukuro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Parker 1 - 0 Shimabukuro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parker has won 51.31% of points on his second serve, while Shimabukuro has won 49.37%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parker, in recent form, has won 53.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimabukuro has won 48.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.64% and 27.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parker has saved 58.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimabukuro has saved 54.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parker has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Shimabukuro winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 128/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Parker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 35/ 14), where as Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Parker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Parker winning 2 and Shimabukuro winning 0. The last match between Parker and Shimabukuro was at the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger, 10-09-2022, Semifinals, Hard with Stuart Parker getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parker and Shimabukuro have played a deciding set 0 times, with Parker winning 0 times and Shimabukuro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Parker winning 1, and Shimabukuro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parker has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.33 while Shimabukuro has played against players with an average rank of 295.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parker has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimabukuro has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parker has converted 48.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimabukuro has converted 51.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
548
Rank
346
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
65% (181-97)
Career Total W/L
62% (215-133)
82% (23-5)
YTD W/L
26% (5-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$196,505
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Parker VS Shimabukuro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Stuart Parker | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:40 | 2:3:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (59/83) | 58% (48/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (43/59) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 51% (18/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (32/83) | 35% (29/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Parker VS Shimabukuro H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Stuart Parker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stuart Parker | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (23/5) | 26% (5/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 80% (44/11) | 35% (15/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (319/216) | 45% (186/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 79% (19/5) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 58 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:23 | 1:35:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.39 | 317.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (969/1425) | 57% (746/1305) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (676/969) | 67% (503/746) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (236/456) | 49% (276/559) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (86/177) | 51% (40/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (665/1473) | 35% (420/1214) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (4/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (22/27) | 28% (5/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (21/21) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (21/0) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (11/0) |
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Karan Singh
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Felipe Virgili Berini
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Maxence Bertimon
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
18
|
2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Stuart Parker
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Antoine Vincent
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stuart Parker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Moerani Bouzige
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Parker Vs Shimabukuro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Stuart Parker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
